#16DaysOfActivism - Human Rights and Migration Policy: an increasing divide
By Maria Monserrat Escudero and Dolores Modern
Human Rights in context
This year, commemorating Human Rights day is critical.
The Human Rights Framework guided governments, policymakers, and societies in general for decades, enshrining the value of human life, dignity and compassion beyond borders. Alarmingly, this consensus is now being challenged globally. In the UK, we can see this clearly with the pledge by some MPs to scrap the Human Rights Act and leave the European Convention on Human Rights. But we don’t need to go this far to put Human Rights at risk. By demonising migration, this government is fuelling the narrative that questions whether we are all deserving of rights and entitlements.
Human Rights are interlinked, and most importantly, inherent to every human being. By alienating certain groups of people from their fundamental rights, we are stripping them from their humanity. In the context of the 16 days of activism, where the importance of eradicating violence against women and girls is in the spotlight, the interconnectedness of Human Rights comes into centre.
The dehumanising effect of the hostile immigration environment
The cruelty of the current hostile environment migrants, asylum seekers and refugees are living in cannot be overstated. Our communities have progressively seen their vulnerability increase for years. And when we thought things could not get much worse, a government many of us had put our hopes in, turned on us.
Migrants have become the scapegoats for state failings of all kinds. We are to blame for the housing crisis, for austerity impacting the working class, for salaries falling and working conditions worsening. There is no evidence that shows that migration has caused any of these issues, or that reducing migration would fix them. However, the idea that migrants, asylum seekers and refugees are impoverishing the UK by taking from British citizens is spun across media, parliamentary debates, and now at dinner tables.
The purpose of these narratives is not to fix the root causes of the issues facing the UK. They are used and exploited to create division, cover failings and gain political support in a context of crisis and concern. These narratives and the policies that derive from them are also an extension of the colonial project, which extracted from and exploited ‘othered’ populations. Now, we see it happening within the UK borders by allowing for the dehumanisation of human beings who have made this country their home, however temporarily.
The real life impact of dehumanising migrants
The downgrading of the Human Rights framework and the narratives that enable this affect everyone. A mother might be afraid to speak to her child in her own language in public. A child might face bullying at school. A worker might fear reporting their employer for abusing their rights. A student might choose not to continue pursuing their education in the UK for fear of violence. This creates a fragmented society, where fear seeps into communities and erodes the trust and solidarity that hold us together. It also opens the door to further curtailing of rights.
For those most at risk, including the women we work with who are survivors of gender-based violence, trafficking, and exploitation, this context makes it even harder to access support, justice, and redress. These women, who are often experiencing intersecting issues related to structural racism and class discrimination, are being systematically failed by this government from multiple fronts. They are the very people the government claims to want to protect.
Migrants Rights and Women’s Rights are Human Rights
There are no humans less deserving of a dignified life. Violence against women and girls will not be eradicated if we, as a society, marginalise women who, due to their immigration status, are subjected to institutional violence and discrimination. The idea of “earning” Human Rights through, for example, increasingly complex conditions for settlement, goes against the commitments this country has taken to abandon the colonial project and become a firm supporter of the advancement of all peoples.
In this context, communities and solidarity networks are taking the role of the state and protecting those most vulnerable. However, charities and communities alone cannot revert the consequences of these curtailments.
But we refuse to lose hope. When in crisis, humanity has thrived by strengthening community bonds, and pulling each other up. The UK was once a leading voice in the adoption of Human Rights globally, being the first nation to ratify the European Convention of Human Rights. We need a government that can take up the mantle, refusing to be blinded by short-term political gain, and steps up to the challenges facing our times.
Everyone deserves to live in dignity. A fair immigration system that offers equal and real protections is the only way to guarantee Human Rights.
Another Autumn Budget, Another year of uncertainty for VAWG services and victim-survivors
Thursday, 27 November 2025
Yesterday’s budget did not mention Violence Against Women and Girls (VAWG) once – a glaring omission at a time when demand for specialist support is at record levels and victim-survivors have a 60% chance of being turned away from refuge, primarily due to lack of space and the No Recourse to Public Funds condition. Despite a manifesto commitment to halve VAWG, the government’s Budget has provided no new funding for the specialist organisations supporting victim-survivors of VAWG and their children.
With rising demand, higher operational costs, Police and Crime Commissioner (PCC) funding cuts, a cost-of-living crisis, and the impact of a previous National Insurance increase, services already under immense strain now face even greater financial pressure. For VAWG organisations delivering life-saving support, this picture means longer waiting lists, reduced support, and in some areas, the real risk of services shutting down entirely. We have already seen 3 Rape Crisis Centres close in the last 12 months, and they remain – as almost all other women’s services do – unsure about their future beyond the end of this financial year.
While we welcome the scrapping of the two-child limit, which also means an end to women needing to 'prove' they were raped in order to qualify for the exemption on the benefit cap, the government’s failure to include support for victim-survivors in the budget is devastating for the thousands of women and children who rely on specialist trauma-informed support every day. It also has significant implications for our economy, productivity, and broader quality of life, if those seeking safety, justice and recovery after experiencing violence cannot secure the support they need, and rebuild their lives.
The government’s continued imposition of short-term, fragmented funding for VAWG services is actively hindering its own commitment to halve VAWG within a decade and undermining frontline work. While the entirety of the VAWG sector is affected, the impact is particularly severe for smaller, specialist ‘by and for’ organisations supporting Black, minoritised and migrant women. These services are six times less likely to receive government funding and operate at a 39% shortfall in funding1, despite generating more than £42 million in public savings each year. Chronic underfunding, combined with a hostile and anti-migrant political environment and increasingly competitive funding systems, continues to place them at severe structural disadvantage.
“‘We've always been in survival mode since 2012, when the austerity measures kicked in and our local authorities stopped funding us [...] The current situation is literally getting us from one year to the next year to the next year’...”
Evidence shows 67% of Black, minoritised and migrant victim-survivors want ‘by and for services’. These services are not optional add-ons; they are essential, life-saving -and in many cases, the only safe and accessible spaces equipped to provide holistic support to some of the most vulnerable victim-survivors. Yet far too many specialist organisations remain locked out of fair and accessible funding.
As the representatives of leading women's sector organisations, we are yet to see the things we know are needed - long-term, secure funding for all women, including those with No Recourse to Public Funds and recognition and support for Rape Crisis Centres.
Ahead of the publication of the VAWG strategy, we urge the government to:
- Commit a minimum of £502 million of investment in specialist domestic abuse organisations, which should include £222m for refuge services and £280m for community-based services.
- Create national ring-fenced funding for specialist VAWG organisations, including ‘by and for’ services, in line with the Domestic Abuse Commissioner’s recommendations, including £158.3 million in ring-fenced for Black and minoritised, deaf and disabled, and LGBT+ victim-survivors, and £63.5 million per annum in dedicated funding for victim-survivors with No Recourse to Public Funds.5
- Urgent continuation and substantial increase of the Rape and Sexual Abuse Support Fund (RASASF) fund, with appropriate year on year uplifts, over a 4-year period in line with other commitments.
- Replace short-term, fragmented funding with stable, multi-year funding allows services to plan, retain skilled staff, and meet increasing demand.
- Reform competitive funding and commissioning models to ensure equitable access for all specialist organisations, recognising the distinct role played ‘by and for’ services and the structural inequalities they face.
Without sustainable investment, life-saving VAWG services will continue to operate on the brink, and the government’s commitment to ending VAWG will remain unmet. Victim-survivors deserve better, and specialist organisations cannot continue to shoulder this responsibility without the resources required to keep women and children safe.





Sources:
[1] https://www.womensaid.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Unsuccessful-referrals-into-refuge.pdf
[2] https://southallblacksisters.org.uk/submissions-campaigns/investing-in-safety/
[3] https://www.imkaan.org.uk/home-affairs-committee-report-response-funding-vawg
LAWRS supports the statement on the weaponisation of VAWG
The statement has been co-ordinated by organisations including End Violence Against Women Coalition, Women for Refugee Women, Hibiscus, Southall Black Sisters and Asylum Matters, and is endorsed by Imkaan and the Step Up Migrant Women Coalition:
--
In the last weeks, we have seen how vital conversations about violence against women and girls (VAWG) are being hijacked by an anti-migrant agenda that fuels division, harms survivors and ultimately impedes the real work of tackling the root causes of society-wide violence, to the detriment of women and girls. We write as organisations on the frontlines of combatting VAWG to urge the Government to address this dangerous narrative.
We condemn all acts of violence against women and girls and the immense harm which such acts cause to individuals and communities. The facts about violence against women and girls in the UK are stark:
-
Almost one in three women will experience domestic abuse, and sexual offences are at the highest level recorded.
-
Two women a week in the UK are murdered by a partner or ex-partner.
-
More than 90% of perpetrators of rape and sexual assault are known to their victims.
-
One in two rapes against women are carried out by a partner or ex-partner.
-
One in three adult survivors of rape experience it in their own home.
-
Women who can’t access public funds, such as welfare support or housing assistance - due to No Recourse to Public Funds conditions - are three times more likely to experience VAWG.
We have been alarmed in recent weeks by an increase in unfounded claims made by people in power, and repeated in the media, that hold particular groups as primarily responsible for sexual violence. This not only undermines genuine concerns about women’s safety but also reinforces the damaging myth that the greatest risk of gender-based violence comes from strangers.
Every act of VAWG is a form of injustice. It is an injustice that violence against women and girls is carried out in our workplaces, in our schools, in our streets and most commonly, in our homes. It is an uncomfortable reality that it is committed in every economic group, ethnicity, age and social group, and overwhelmingly by the men who are in women and girls’ lives. VAWG is also perpetrated by people who move to the UK, but the racist idea that this is solely an imported problem flies in the face of women and girls’ daily experiences in the UK.
These horrifying facts must be addressed with sustainable investment in prevention and support services, and by removing state-imposed barriers to support for survivors. Instead, the issue is being hijacked by people seeking to use women and girls’ pain and trauma - and the threat of it - for political gain.
Over recent weeks, people claiming to care about the “safety of women and children” have left families, women and children living in temporary asylum accommodation afraid to leave their front door. They follow in the footsteps of the rioters who used the appalling murder of three young girls as an excuse to bring violence to our streets; with targeted attacks against migrant, minoritised and Muslim communities. That two out of five of those arrested for that disorder themselves had police histories of domestic abuse illustrates not only the pervasiveness of gender-based violence but the disingenuous nature of many of those who claim to have the interests of women and children at heart. Meanwhile, members of Parliament freely share false statistics about the nationality of perpetrators. Government ministers have even endorsed some of this summer’s demonstrators as having ‘legitimate’ concerns, which risks normalising and enabling the spreading of racist narratives by the far-right.
Not only do these falsehoods fail to keep women safe, they serve as a racist distraction that actively impedes the urgent work of addressing gender-based violence. Myths and misconceptions about sexual violence act as a barrier to justice for survivors. Spreading an inaccurate picture of VAWG in the UK allows the people - overwhelmingly men, from all walks of life - who harm women and girls to hide behind racial stereotypes and scapegoating. Meanwhile, hostile immigration policies propped up by this misinformation put many of the most marginalised women and survivors in the UK - racialised, migrant, refugee and asylum-seeking women - at even greater risk of harm, destitution, homelessness, exploitation and criminalisation.
The government has pledged to halve violence against women and girls. This is a challenging but achievable ambition, but it cannot be done while lies about its causes are endorsed by those in the highest positions of power - Parliament and the media - and allowed to spread unchecked.
We urge the Government to show leadership in responding to the weaponisation of VAWG, including changing its framing of migration, promoting an accurate picture of violence against women and girls, and holding those who spread misinformation to account. We cannot afford for this agenda to drive further attacks on migrant communities or harm efforts to develop a coherent, effective strategy to address the real causes of gender-based violence. All women and girls deserve for us to face and confront the reality of VAWG, so that we can pave the way in ending it.
Joint Statement to “Earned Settlement” Announcement
The government’s announcements yesterday mark a significant escalation in state-sanctioned violence against Black, minoritised and migrant victim-survivors of violence against women and girls (VAWG) who face the dual perpetration of abuse and insecure immigration status. As ending VAWG and by-and-for specialist organisations supporting migrant women, we strongly oppose the government’s proposed reforms to settlement and support rights outlined in the “Fairer Pathway to Settlement” consultation paper and raise alarm at the impact these changes will have on some of the most vulnerable victim-survivors. The implementation of these changes will lead to a state of emergency for victim-survivors of VAWG and exploitation.
Increasing the qualifying period for Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR) from the existing 5 years will force victim-survivors already living in precarious situations to endure years of more uncertainty with severe and life-threatening consequences for their safety, access to justice, and support. These changes will be a gift to perpetrators who weaponise an already hostile immigration system to perpetrate their abuse and will prolong dependence on them.
Penalising the use of public funds, debt and criminalisation as part of an “earned settlement” model is both harmful and cruel. For many victim-survivors, debt, benefit use and minor offences are a direct or indirect consequence of violence and abuse. Turning these experiences into barriers to settlement punishes victim-survivors for circumstances which are beyond their control. Many Black, minoritised and migrant women who are victim-survivors of VAWG, trafficking, harmful practices and other forms of violence face unavoidable circumstances as a direct result of the abuse, which affects their ability to meet the criteria outlined yesterday - pushing women and children into further harm and destitution. The requirements to qualify for settlement necessitating “spotless” criminal records put victim-survivors who have been criminalised because of trafficking or exploitation in serious jeopardy, blocking them from security, safety and support.
We know that these reforms will not act in isolation. Extended settlement routes, harsher suitability rules, benefit and debt penalties and deeper immigration dependency create a perfect storm for those who are already vulnerable. These are deeply unrealistic standards for anyone, let alone those facing extreme risks to their lives.
The proposed policy entrenches a discriminatory two-tiered system in which most migrant people, especially women, are penalised. By allowing wealth and specific nationality routes to bypass the harshest criteria, the Government makes clear that safety, stability and the right to build a life here are privileges for a select few. Meanwhile, migrants fulfilling essential roles who are at the lower income spectrum, including healthcare workers, care workers, domestic workers and others on the lowest incomes, face the harshest, most punitive barriers and the very real threat of being denied permanent status altogether.
The proposed system’s demand for ‘contributions to the economy and community’ before settlement is deeply flawed. The arbitrary definition of ‘contribution’ ignores the structural inequalities and the weaponisation of the system by perpetrators to the detriment of Black, minoritised and migrant victim-survivors who are unable to ‘contribute’ in the traditional sense, as well as gender and racial pay gaps. This model also fails to account for migrant women who tend to be overrepresented in care, cleaning and domestic work and other foundational sectors that are repeatedly categorised as “low-skilled”. Such hierarchies entrench racist and gendered assumptions about whose work matters and reinforce exploitation and exclusion, and pose a threat to women who have been criminalised because of trafficking or exploitation, blocking them from security, safety and support.
These harmful reforms arrive at a time of extreme precarity and instability when frontline services and safety nets are already stretched to breaking point. Instead of expanding protections for victim-survivors of VAWG, the government is actively dismantling the existing rights-based framework. The impact will be life-threatening to those already in dire need of safety. Those with precarious status are far more vulnerable to coercion, exploitation and repeated cycles of violence and abuse. Cutting off routes to support will embolden abusers who know victims are less able to leave, seek protection or have access to resources.
The state must ensure the ability to secure status without penalising the receipt of support, debt or prior offences which are the direct legacy of abuse. Victim-survivors of VAWG and trafficking rely on state support designed to ensure they can leave violent and abusive situations, recover and bring their perpetrators to account. To delay settlement for relying on these same protections, such as access to public funds, creates a fundamentally unfair system that penalises these victims-survivors twice for the abuse they have endured. There must be explicit protections to ensure that criminalisation or economic disadvantages arising from abuse do not become a barrier to settlement.
These policies are catastrophic for victim-survivors of VAWG. This is an urgent crisis, and we call on the Government to treat it as such. We urge reversal of these punitive measures and the creation of a truly safe, accessible immigration system grounded in feminist values and a human-rights framework.
Labour’s immigration policy and LAWRS
The Immigration White Paper
In May this year, the UK Government released its Immigration White Paper, outlining a series of proposed changes to immigration policy. These proposals have created widespread uncertainty and fear among migrant communities — feelings that persist today, as many details remain undecided.
The direction taken by the government is deeply concerning. Rather than dismantling the hostile environment created under previous Conservative governments, it seeks to entrench and expand it — to the detriment of society as a whole.
The proposed measures are, and will continue to be, particularly harmful to migrant women — especially those who are survivors of gender-based violence, trafficking, modern slavery, and exploitative or unsafe working conditions.
LAWRS, together with partner organisations Southall Black Sisters, Hibiscus and EVAW, joined by 100+ organisations, are fighting these cruel policies. We have released a response outlining how they will harm migrant women and concluded with a protest outside of the Home Office on the 15th of October. However, we know that this will be a long fight — one that will require sustained collective action, solidarity across movements, and a continued commitment to centring the voices and leadership of migrant women.
Why are we so concerned?
Mainstreaming the far-right in immigration policies
The White Paper marks a dangerous and racially discriminatory escalation which scapegoats immigrants, not austerity, for economic and social deprivation. The government is mainstreaming far-right rhetoric, using this to inform reactionary policy-making at a time when violence against immigrants, asylum-seekers and refugees is increasing.
This is evident not only in the White Paper, but in subsequent statements from the Prime Minister and other members of his cabinet, as well as in the government’s failure to condemn the actions of far-right groups who are targeting migrants and people seeking asylum.
Migrant victim/survivors of domestic abuse
The government has pledged to halve gender-based violence in 10 years. Yet in its White Paper, it fails to address the vulnerability of migrant women survivors of VAWG. Frontline services such as LAWRS support migrant women whose inability to access mainstream refuges, financial support, stable housing or quality legal advice prevents them from fleeing domestic abuse and rebuilding their lives. Existing protections, such as the Migrant Victims of Domestic Abuse Concession (MVDAC) and Domestic Violence Indefinite Leave to Remain (DVILR) are extremely limited, and cover only a limited number of women with insecure immigration status.
Moreover, the risk of statutory services, including the police, sharing information with immigration enforcement is directly weaponised by perpetrators, deterring reporting and access to protection. Individuals who are now in government have previously emphasised the critical need for a firewall between immigration enforcement and the police. Despite this, commitments to remove these barriers have not been followed through, and protections remain unavailable for most migrant victim/survivors.
Labour market and immigration
This government continues to devalue what they frame as “low-skilled” roles overwhelmingly held by migrant women in the UK. This includes care work, cleaning and support services, where essential workers already lack fair conditions and robust protections. The decision to scrap care worker visas is particularly alarming and risks collapsing an already fragile sector.
We are alarmed that genuine workforce planning and sectoral investment are being replaced with a reliance on migrant women workers as temporary stopgaps for labour shortages. By restricting their access to long-term stability and settlement, these policies force workers to accept poor conditions and deepen dependency on partners or employers, increasing the risk of abuse and exploitation
We also wholly reject the government’s framing of immigration control as a means to address labour exploitation. This narrative misrepresents the root causes of abuse in the labour market and instead targets the victims/survivors, rather than the exploitative employers who profit from their precarity.
Criminalisation of victim/survivors
In the UK, most women in prison or under community supervision have experienced abuse or exploitation. For vulnerable migrant survivors, criminality often results from coercion or economic precarity. As expressed above, migrant women also face barriers to report abuse and exploitation, meaning they slip through the cracks before later coming into contact with the criminal justice system. Automatic deportation and accelerated removals will prevent survivors from pursuing meaningful justice and rebuilding their lives.
Urgent priorities for action
The Government faces an urgent choice: to continue bolstering far-right ideology or to take immediate action to protect migrant victims/survivors. We call on the Government to:
- Abandon the UK Government’s Immigration White Paper (May 2025), which harms victim/survivors of VAWG, trafficking and modern slavery.
- Implement safe reporting mechanisms.
- End the criminalisation of victim/survivors of VAWG, trafficking and modern slavery.
- Fully repeal the Illegal Migration Act (2023) and the Nationality and Borders Act (2022).
- Tackle systemic racism and structural inequalities.
- Centre and provide ring-fenced funding for by and for organisations.
- Extend the combined MVDAC-DVILR model to all victim/survivors regardless of immigration status.
VAWG Takeover at Labour Conference: Putting Women and Girls at the Centre
As the Labour Party Conference gets underway this weekend, specialist violence against women and girls (VAWG) organisations will take over the agenda – calling on the government to turn its pledge to halve VAWG within a decade into meaningful action.
Leading VAWG organisations – including community-based ‘by and for’ services – are coming together at the Conference to have the urgent conversations this government has neglected to hold. Through three key events, we will call for vital reforms:
● Sunday 28 September – Reception on building a whole-system approach to VAWG, focused on the sector’s priorities for the national strategy to ensure a joined-up, coordinated response to preventing VAWG, investing in support for victim-survivors, and holding perpetrators and institutions to account.
● Monday 29 September – Roundtable on the erasure of Black, minoritised, and migrant women and girls from government commitments, focused on the systemic barriers facing these communities and the urgent reforms needed to ensure access to life-saving support and justice.
● Tuesday 30 September – Panel on post-separation abuse of women and children, focused on the hidden harms of abuse that continue after separation and the measures government must take to address them.
These events will amplify the call for:
● A comprehensive, integrated, whole-system approach to prevent and respond to all forms of VAWG - including domestic abuse, sexual violence, economic abuse, so-called ‘honour’-based abuse, stalking, and online harms.
● Multi-year funding for specialist victim-survivor support services, with ringfenced support for ‘by and for’ organisations.
● Recognition of children as victims in their own right.
● A full firewall between the police and Immigration Enforcement, and the abolition of No Recourse to Public Funds (NRPF) for migrant victim-survivors.
● The inclusion of asylum-seeking women within the government’s mission to end VAWG.
The Labour government’s pledge to halve VAWG within a decade is a welcome starting point. But pledges alone will not be enough. As the scourge of VAWG – perpetrated disproportionately by men – continues to devastate lives, urgent and decisive action is required. Too many victim-survivors are left with lasting trauma, and for some, the consequences are fatal. VAWG organisations’ events at the Conference will make clear that if the government is serious about its mission, it must listen to the sector, centre women and girls in every decision, and deliver the reforms needed to end VAWG once and for all.
For far too long, state failures to prevent violence and respond effectively to victim-survivors have left women and girls with little confidence in the system. A recent survey revealed that 69% of women had either first- or second-hand experience of VAWG. Black, minoritised, and migrant women and girls are further marginalised by institutional racism and the barrier of NRPF. Research shows migrant women with NRPF are three times more likely to be subjected to VAWG. Femicide figures in London also highlight racial disproportionality: in 2023, over 62% of victims were Black, a shocking rise from 43% in 2022.
These numbers should stop us in our tracks. Behind every statistic is a woman or girl whose life has been cut short or profoundly harmed. Now, more than ever, we must prioritise tackling VAWG. The Labour manifesto offers hope for long-overdue reforms – reforms the specialist VAWG sector has been championing for decades.
Yet progress has been slow and, to VAWG organisations’ deep disappointment, meaningful consultation has been blocked. Even discussions on the forthcoming VAWG strategy – which will likely underpin the government’s solutions – have excluded many of the very experts who work alongside victim-survivors daily. This is alarming. The sector’s expertise is rooted in decades of lived experience and frontline evidence; silencing these voices risks designing policies that fail the very women they are meant to protect.
Instead of centring victim-survivors, the government has leaned too heavily on a criminal justice approach. Reform of our broken system is essential, as it currently re-traumatises many victim-survivors of sexual violence and abuse, particularly due to lengthy Crown Court backlogs and shamefully low charging and attrition rates. Yet a sole focus on the criminal justice system ignores the widespread mistrust that many women and girls hold towards it, preventing them from ever engaging with the system in the first place. This mistrust is even more acute for Black, minoritised, and migrant women, who often face disbelief, racist stereotypes, and the absence of a firewall to protect them from Immigration Enforcement when seeking help. Without a firewall, many women are forced to choose between silence and safety, fearing that reporting abuse will lead to detention or deportation. Research from the Step Up Migrant Women campaign found that over 60% of migrant women had the abuser threaten them with deportation if they sought help – showing how immigration status is weaponised to trap women in abuse.
Compounding this, investment in life-saving support has been grossly inadequate. Community-based ‘by and for’ services – proven to be highly effective – are six times less likely to receive government funding. Despite evidence showing a need for £502 million annually for victim-survivor domestic abuse support, including £280 million for community-based services, only £19.9 million additional funding has been pledged for victim-survivor support services this year to a handful of services, in the context of actual and real-terms cuts to existing funding streams. The effect of this inadequate funding is already having a tangible impact on victim-survivor services and victim-survivors, with three specialist Rape Crisis centres forced to close their doors already this year and services for Black, minoritised, and migrant victim-survivors operating under unprecedented precarity. While the Government has invested £53 million across four years into high-risk, high-harm domestic abuse perpetrator responses, the disparity with direct investment in essential victim-survivor support, particularly specialist ‘by and for’ services and sexual violence provision, is stark. These services remain on a cliff edge, raising a pressing question: where in these measures are victim-survivors being seen, heard, and supported?
The focus on reporting and already identified perpetrators sidelines Black, minoritised, and migrant women – particularly those with insecure immigration status – who face structural barriers to engaging
with the criminal justice system. The failure to invest in specialist ‘by and for’ services not only leaves them with limited avenues for safety but also costs the state. Estimates show investment in such services could save £127 million nationally. Without this investment, marginalised women are left with the least protections and the greatest risks. In the current political climate, these risks are further exacerbated by the way VAWG is being weaponised to fuel racist, anti-immigrant narratives – distracting from the true causes of violence and undermining the frontline work that is already saving lives.
VAWG organisations see the Conference as a vital opportunity to reset the government’s approach. We urge ministers to recognise the urgency of what is being called for – and to work in partnership with the VAWG sector to deliver the transformative change women and girls have been demanding for decades.
Selma Taha, Executive Director, Southall Black Sisters, said:
“While we welcome the government’s commitment to halving violence against women and girls within a decade, we are extremely concerned that the current approach risks leaving Black, minoritised, and migrant women and girls behind. Specialist, community-based ‘by and for’ services have too often been sidelined and excluded from vital conversations about the urgent reforms needed to prevent and address VAWG. We are calling for an end to this exclusion – we must have a seat at the table to share the lived experiences and needs of some of the most marginalised women and girls, and to contribute meaningfully to shaping legal and policy reforms, particularly in an increasingly racist and hostile immigration environment. We hope that the VAWG takeover at the Labour Party Conference will be a first step toward that change.”
Gisela Valle, Executive Director, Latin American Women’s Rights Service, said:
“For far too long we have known that the prioritisation of immigration control over safety places migrant women at risk of violence and abuse whilst severely limiting their access to justice and support. Recent vital pieces of legislation such as the Domestic Abuse Act and the Victims and Prisoners Act left migrant survivors completely unprotected, cementing existing discriminatory responses that disproportionately affect black and minoritised migrant women. For this reason, an ambition to halve VAWG could not be achieved if it doesn’t specifically address the needs of those most marginalised and offers equal protection to all. The ending VAWG sector is keen to support the government’s development of a strategy that brings all of these considerations to the table to develop robust system wide responses that effectively respond to the needs of the most vulnerable. We view the VAWG takeover at the Labour Party Conference as a prime opportunity to foster this collaboration for the benefit of all.”
Andrea Vukovic, Co-Director, Women for Refugee Women, said:
“Most women seeking asylum in the UK are survivors of gender-based violence – including rape, domestic abuse, forced marriage, sexual exploitation, and female genital cutting. Yet their experiences are routinely overlooked, and instead of receiving the safety and support they need to recover, they are met with an asylum system that exposes them to further abuse, exploitation and harm. This not only causes immense suffering but directly undermines the Government’s ability to meet its pledge to halve violence against women and girls within a decade. If asylum-seeking women are excluded from this promise, a dangerous two-tier system will persist – where asylum-seeking women, predominantly from racialised backgrounds, are treated as less deserving of protection and support. We look forward to building momentum around this issue at the Labour Party Conference, and to working with others across the sector to push for a VAWG strategy that leaves no woman behind. The government must recognise that protecting all survivors is not optional, it is essential for achieving real, lasting change.”
Dr Sara Reis, Deputy Director and Head of Policy and Research, UK Women’s Budget Group, said:
“The lifetime economic cost of sexual violence and abuse perpetrated in one year alone is estimated to be £400 billion. Failing to invest in tackling VAWG is not just morally indefensible – it’s also economically reckless.”
Gemma Sherrington, CEO, Refuge, said:
“The government’s pledge to halve violence against women and girls is ambitious and important – and it’s vital we do not let that focus slip. This commitment must mean halving all forms of VAWG – both online and offline – and protecting all women and girls, including Black, minoritised and migrant women, and those with insecure immigration status. It must be backed by long-term, sustainable funding for frontline services – particularly ‘by and for’ organisations – and developed in genuine partnership with the specialist VAWG sector. We have a real opportunity to transform the systems that are failing women. We cannot afford to waste it.”
Ciara Bergman, Chief Executive, Rape Crisis England & Wales, said:
“Every year, Rape Crisis centres support enough survivors to fill Wembley Stadium. Our 24/7 Support Line connects another stadium’s worth of calls. And over a million people come to our website, most often wanting to know whether what happened to them ‘counts’.
We think it does. But a lack of political will or funding commitments means we are on the brink of losing these, and other, specialist support services. Rape Crisis Centres have not benefited from additional funding announcements, 3 Rape Crisis Centres have closed in the last year alone, and almost a third of our remaining centres (27%) are at risk of imminent closure unless the government commit to extending funding beyond March 2026. We call on the Government to secure the future of all services supporting women in the aftermath of VAWG, including vital specialist by-and-for services supporting Black, minoritised and migrant women and girls.
Survivors of male violence and abuse deserve better than this, and we know it’s possible.”
Farah Nazeer, CEO, Women’s Aid, said:
“We are at a pivotal moment in our fight towards eradicating domestic abuse – our government has made the welcome commitment to halving VAWG in the next decade and the time for decisive action is now. We urge the government to work with us and our sector colleagues to deliver change where it truly matters – the epidemic of VAWG will not be solved without addressing the root causes of misogyny and racism. Improving perpetrator responses and the criminal justice system alone will not work in isolation, we must listen to survivors and support them where they need it most, and for that, long-term, secure funding for domestic abuse services is essential. Only this can guarantee that the sector continues providing life-saving support to women and children when and where they need it most. Survivors must have the same access to support regardless of where they are in the country, regardless of their race or immigration status. The upcoming Strategy is a unique opportunity to make true, long-lasting change and keep women and children safe – we stand ready to work together to end this heinous crime once and for all.”
Andrea Simon, Executive Director, End Violence Against Women Coalition, said:
“We are now over one year on from the Labour government’s election with its manifesto commitment to halve VAWG within a decade. We are still without any published VAWG strategy which sets out what action the government plans to take to uphold the rights of women and girls to live free from violence and abuse. This state of limbo is causing great uncertainty for our coalition – with every day that passes, more
women and girls are avoidably harmed and life-saving specialist VAWG services lose staff and face risk of closure. Meanwhile, the government’s approach to migration continues to entrap survivors, whilst migrant and racialised communities are targeted and scapegoated. The challenge we face is urgent. The End Violence Against Women Coalition is participating in this VAWG takeover at Labour Party conference to ensure that VAWG is a political priority for the government, that all survivors are supported without discrimination, and to set out our recommendations for change.”
Sam Smethers, CEO, Surviving Economic Abuse, said:
“Last year, 4.1 million UK women had their money and belongings controlled by an abusive current or ex-partner, trapping them in dangerous situations and making it harder to rebuild their lives. Black, Asian and other racially marginalised women are disproportionately affected, facing economic abuse at more than twice the rate of White women. For migrant victim-survivors, the risks are even greater and escape routes even fewer. To halve violence against women and girls, the government must scrap no recourse to public funds for migrant survivors, create a firewall between statutory services and immigration enforcement, and ensure migrant survivors can open a bank account while regularising their status. The Prime Minister has rightly called economic abuse a “national emergency”. Now we need action to match those words and break the cycle of economic abuse.”
Liz Thompson, Director of External Relations, SafeLives, said:
“We are 100% behind the ambition to halve VAWG in ten years. We call on the PM and the Chancellor to back this commitment with effective long-term resourcing for the system and the services which respond to victims and survivors, particularly those working to support marginalized and minoritised victims, and ensuring these voices are heard. We want to see all Government departments playing an active role and backing any fine words in the new strategy with real cash and hard commitments. Survivor voices must be at the heart of the new strategy along with meaningful engagement with VAWG and domestic abuse services, who play such a vital role in supporting them. We see the ambition from key Ministers to driving change – let’s match that with a pan-Government strategy which goes beyond the criminal justice system and into every area of the response. We stand ready to play our part in making that real for every adult and child survivor.”
Jo Todd CBE, Chief Executive, Respect, said:
“Respect is pleased to be working with our fellow VAWG sector partners to deliver our collective messages at this year's Labour conference. The pledge to halve VAWG in a decade is an ambitious one that will only be fulfilled if the government takes a wider view that not only goes beyond criminal justice but also looks at the root causes of domestic abuse. In addition, we need to see government deliver the funding needed for victims to match the scale of the problem. We stand with our colleagues from the “by and for” organisations that have long been calling for meaningful inclusion in the development of the VAWG strategy, and for issues such as the lack of a firewall to protect migrant victims of domestic abuse to be addressed, as a matter of urgency.”
Volunteers' Month 2025: What has volunteering for LAWRS meant to me?
By Valentina, volunteer on the LAWRS helpline and on the Psychotherapy Team as Administrator.
My two years as a volunteer at LAWRS were an incredible adventure full of growth, personal and professional development, connection with my community and empowerment. I had followed LAWRS for some years prior to joining, but at the time I did not have the time or capacity to volunteer, so I finally did when I had the time to do it. It was wonderful to find a team that was ready to welcome, support and train me.
As a helpline agent volunteer -a challenging but very fulfilling role- I learnt about the needs of the women in our community, how we can help them, but also how to more actively listen and have empathy with personal boundaries. All this whilst having a great team of volunteers to share the experience with, as well as a team who supported me throughout.
After having spent a few years out of the workforce to focus on my family, it was so great to find my confidence again in an organisation that cared for me at a professional and personal level. I also joined the counselling team as an admin volunteer, and it was so rewarding to support the team who do such an important and wonderful job at supporting women through the different challenges they face. I was able to hear first-hand how grateful the women who go through counselling are, what a difference it makes to their lives giving them tools to navigate and cope with whatever they are facing.
One of the highlights of my years at LAWRS was the Women’s March in 2024. It was my first women’s march, and it was so wonderful to walk and speak up with thousands of women from different organisations about a cause that is so important to me: women’s rights and empowerment. It made me feel part of something bigger and made me proud to be a Latin American woman. I will miss LAWRS and its people, and will carry them in my heart always. Thank you for such wonderful and fulfilling two years.
‘Hips Don't Lie’: Exploring how the image of Latina femininity, hyper-sexuality and identity in the mainstream media affects the lives of Latin American women in London
While studying Human, Social, and Political Science at the University of Cambridge, I proposed the following research question for my third-year dissertation:
How do Latin American women in London navigate experiences of racialised femininity and hypersexuality based on mainstream media and community expectations?
Through interviews, I investigated how Latin American women view media representations and their interpretations of 'hypersexualisation' - what it means to them, whether they have experienced it, and whether it is tied to media representation of Latin American women.
I found six key findings, which were the following:
The Power of Visual Imagery
When asked about representation in media they consumed, women primarily discussed U.S. visual imagery and how these shaped dominant ideas of Latin American women. Latin American celebrities with an international presence were also referenced. Women acknowledged the importance of dominant representations while critiquing how they remain exclusionary and reinforce stereotypes.
Latin American women named significant representatives were Jennifer Lopez, KAROL G, Anitta, Shakira, Sofia Vergara, and Anya-Taylor Joy. There were mixed attitudes towards these women; for instance, while women celebrated their achievements, there was criticism that they had more Eurocentric features. Women of African, Asian, and Indigenous descent felt excluded, feeling that visual imagery still has a long way to go. Brazilian women also felt excluded as more focus was on representing Spanish speakers.
British Mainstream Media
Participants noted a lack of representation in British mainstream media, which may have also impacted how non-Latin Americans in London perceive Latin American women. In the absence of media representation, women explored depictions of Latin American identity and femininity in London through community spaces and alternative media. These included the Colombian Consulate, which has a very active role in the celebration of Colombian heritage, and 'Popola', the queer Latinx and Afro-Caribbean night club. One participant identified 'My Uncle Is Not Pablo Escobar', a play performed at the Brixton House, as the first time they felt represented as British-Latinx.
The internet emerged as an important source for finding representation. Some used TikTok to locate other Latin Americans in London. The internet also provided access to streaming services, where women could access Latin American visual media or listen to Latin American artists.
The Latin American Body in Constructing Identity
All participants discussed how there was a stereotypical imagination of what Latin American bodies should look like from non-Latin Americans - petite, slim, curvy, and tanned, but light skin. Most notably, there was excessive focus placed on the idea of having large buttocks - the absence and presence of large buttocks were then used by non-Latin Americans to determine whether a woman 'looks' Latin American or not.
The Latin American body was also frequently discussed regarding movement - women were expected to be able to dance. Furthermore, one woman discussed how she felt that non-Latin American men draw a correlation between the ability to dance and the ability to perform well during sex.
Women shared how they felt that their bodies were more openly commented on, suggesting a sense of entitlement to Latin American bodies - women were either told their body 'gave away' that they were Latin American, that their body did not 'look' Latin American or asked invasive questions about cosmetic surgery.
Perceptions from the British General Population
Women felt that heterosexual cisgender men, irrespective of ethnic background, were the primary perpetrators of attributing hypersexuality to Latin American women. The ‘Latin American’ identity was seen as a 'fetish' or 'type' to be consumed for sexual gratification - for instance, when a woman's Latin American identity is revealed, she becomes seen as 'more' attractive. However, this sentiment was not just limited to men, with one woman sharing how British populations, and 'Westerners' more broadly, perceive Latin American women as a 'sexual' group, which directly opposed how she perceived herself.
The perception of Latin American women was heterogeneous - some women shared generally favourable treatment of their Latin American identity. In contrast, others experienced derogatory comments related to migration status or dating men for citizenship, even if they were born in London.
Is there a pressure to conform?
Most women felt a degree of pressure to conform to the stereotype of Latin American women, but this did not mean they acted on it. The pressure was predominantly rooted in the expectations non-Latin Americans placed on them based on U.S. media representation. Women who grew up in Latin America discussed being unaware of these stereotypes before migration, which came as a cultural shock. Some women have internally questioned whether they are Latin American enough' as they fall outside of the imagined appearance and behaviour of what Latin American women should look like - this included wearing clothes women were not entirely comfortable in or behaving more friendly than they usually would.
There was a duality in conformity to stereotypes—for some women, conformity was a way to access new opportunities. For instance, one woman shared how she will send headshots for acting roles that are 'sexier' as she is aware that directors are looking for this in Latin American actresses. Another woman shared how they may lean into the assumption that they can dance within dating as they can benefit from it.
However, the pressure to conform has dangerous impacts - women who were born in London or migrated at a young age were most impacted by pressure to conform, which led them to behave in ways they now consider age-inappropriate. Most notably, women felt they needed to act 'sexually' from a young age as, despite being teenagers, Latin American women born and raised in London thought they 'had to' project a sexy image as the imagination of the hyper-sexualised Latin American women was ever-present in their lives growing up.
Skin Tone and Ethnicity
Not all women experienced hyper-sexualisation the same - instead, women felt that skin tone and their physical appearance impacted the intensity of how they were sexualised. Women of African descent discuss a double sexualisation - one participant shared that they were perceived as 'exotic' because they were Colombian. Then, their Blackness elevates this sexualisation to a higher degree as they are objectified through exoticised curiosity. In a similar dynamic, women of Asian descent discuss a similar phenomenon - one woman discussed how she was initially sexualised through the lens of Asian women as 'submissive' or a 'sexual geisha'; however, once revealing her Brazilian identity, the way she was sexualised shifted to match stereotypes of Latin American women. Women of Indigenous descent experienced a dichotomy - one woman discussed how her skin tone and ethnicity were sexualised, which led to her being allocated to sexual acting roles. However, there was also an expectation to be 'whiter'. This led her to avoid tanning and having her initial acting headshots over-exposed.
Latin American women who identified as 'white-passing' or 'European-presenting' discussed the levels of privilege they experience in being able to 'hide' their identity. For instance, if women were in situations where Latin American women were being openly sexualised, they could decide not to disclose their identity. However, the appearance of light skin and dark features still led to sexualisation as one woman described her appearance in terms of and discussed that this was 'exciting' for non-Latin American men.
Concluding thoughts
The London Latin American community are institutionally invisible, yet Latin American women's bodies are highly visible because of their racialised sexuality. I end by foregrounding the need for British Latin American representation. Without official statistics, we cannot develop accurate research, as we are unaware of the demographics of Latin American communities. The London Latin American community has been present for decades. Further research is requisite to understand London Latin American women's voices and their myriad experiences.
Join our Young Women’s Advisory Board 2025!
Would you like to unlock your full potential to champion and lead action to tackle violence against women and girls (VAWG)?
At LAWRS, we are looking for 10 enthusiastic Latin American Young Women aged 18 to 24, based in London, to join our Young Women’s Advisory Board for one year 🥳
What’s it about? 🤔
The Young Women’s Advisory Board is an initiative by the Latin American Women’s Rights Service (LAWRS) and its project for girls and young women: Sin Fronteras. The programme seeks to train Latin American Young Women for collective action at the intersection of migration, age, gender, amongst other issues.
This programme provides you with theoretical and practical skills in feminist leadership and advocacy that you will be able to apply in your life, your career, and with your community.
The program will be held in English and Spanish and meetings will be in-person in London.
Policy, sorority and leadership!
Who’s it for? 🤷🏽♀️
Latin American Young Women aged 18 to 24*, based in London, are invited to participate in the Young Women’s Advisory Board and will receive a stipend to support their engagement in the programme (at London Living Wage levels).
* This also includes first and second generation young women with Latin American ethnicity and European/UK nationality.
* You must be at most 24 years old by the time of submitting the application form.
How? 👩🏽💻
The one year programme (May 2025 - March 2026) consists of 12 Leadership and Advocacy training sessions and group meetings about tackling violence against women and girls (VAWG) as Latin American young migrant women advocates, and 3 organisational planned activities (LAWRS’ Annual General Meeting (AGM), LAWRS’ International Women’s Day event (IWD), and the International Women’s Day Million Women Rise March).
Programme Timeline 🗓️
Programme Starts: Saturday 10th May 2025!
Leadership and Advocacy training sessions and group meetings:
All of these will take place on Saturdays from 11am - 3 pm, in-person in London.
- 10th of May 2025
- 24th of May 2025
- 7th of June 2025
- 21st of June 2025
- 5th of July 2025
- 19th of July 2025
- 2nd of August 2025
- 13th of September 2025
- 27th of September 2025
- 25th of October 2025
- 22nd of November 2025
- 6th of December 2025
Organisational planned activities:
- 8th of November 2025: LAWRS's Annual General Meeting (AGM).
- 28th of February 2026: LAWRS's International Women's Day Event (IWD).
- 7th of March 2026: International Women's Day: Million Women Rise March
Program Ends: Saturday 7th March 2026.
* Throughout the year we expect to have participative activities where the YWAB can amplify their network and uptake action. These are highly recommended activities, however they are not compulsory and will not be financially compensated.
Benefits 🤩
With the Young Women’s Advisory Board you can: gain skills, meet new people, and influence LAWRS’ policy work bringing young migrant women’s voices to the centre of the organisation and the public debate.
Get involved in the work that we do, get paid for your time, gain valuable experience to include in your CV, get trained in leadership and activism, and be invited to LAWRS events and beyond!
This is your chance to create a more equal world for girls and young women, participate in a collective social change actions programme to tackle violence against women and girls (VAWG), and shape LAWRS’ policy work.
Apply Now! 🙋🏽♀️
Apply online using our Application Form: ➡️ ➡️ https://forms.gle/PXK37PotgJyS1sr29 ⬅️ ⬅️
Applications open until Friday 25th April 2025.
Please note that completion of the application form does not guarantee a place in the programme.
If your application is accepted, you will be invited to an interview. The interviews (30 minutes approximately) are going to be conducted online, on the 28th April and 1st May at some point between 10am and 4pm.
If selected, you are expected to attend the opening session on Saturday 10th May 2025.
Contact 🤳🏼
Melissa, the project coordinator, would be happy to talk to you if you have any questions or need support with your application. You can contact her at: sinfronteras@lawrs.org.uk / 07802 645001.
We would be grateful if you could also share this information with your network as we want to ensure many young women know about this opportunity, especially those with a passion to make a difference in the lives of women and girls.
Thank you for taking an interest, we can’t wait to hear from you! 🥰
Voices of Young Latinas: Peer Research into Sexual Harassment at London Universities
The Young Women’s Advisory Board (YWAB) at LAWRS is launching its latest work: ‘Voices of Young Latinas: Peer Research into Sexual Harassment at London Universities.’
Who We Are
The YWAB is a group of young Latin American women aged 18-25 dedicated to addressing all forms of violence against women and girls (VAWG). We approach this work from our unique lived experiences and intersecting identities as migrants, Latin Americans, and young women. By gathering in a safe, collaborative space, we focus on building leadership and advocacy skills, engaging in policy discussions, and increasing our abilities to influence decision-making spaces to benefit young women in our community.
Our Programme and the design of a Peer Research Report
Our YWAB programme ran from April 2024 to March 2025, with training sessions focusing on peer research, leadership and advocacy, VAWG, sexual harassment, and artivism. These sessions have been guided by LAWRS, Partnership for Young London, and the artist Ximena Ruiz del Río.
Through discussing shared experiences, we discovered a gap in research concerning how Latin American women’s intersecting identities affect their experiences with sexual harassment in higher education. The impact of this harassment deeply affects us as we navigate university spaces. To amplify our advocacy efforts, we decided to create a peer research report that gives voice to these experiences.
We held a focus group to design our research question. All of the participants within our group were either starting, in the process of, or had finished their university degree. We discovered that most of us had faced some form of sexual harassment tied to our identities as Latin American women. These abuses were often unseen, overlooked,or normalised yet they had a profound personal impact in our lives. Our research explored how stereotypes, accents, migration, racism, xenophobia, and sexism intersect and shape these experiences.
We carried out 13 semi-structured interviews and designed and distributed a questionnaire, receiving 32 survey responses. Using thematic analysis, we collaboratively wrote this peer research report, which includes key findings and policy recommendations.
Key Findings
Our research revealed five key findings:
- Sexual harassment has a significant negative impact on Latin American women across multiple areas of life.
- University procedures for reporting sexual harassment are broken, making them an inaccessible and time-consuming process which deters reporting.
- Multiple stigmatisation of being a migrant, Latin American, and a woman dissuades women from reporting as it positions them as more vulnerable.
- Stereotypes surrounding Latin American women make them more vulnerable to sexual harassment as they’re perceived as more ‘sexually available’.
- The frequency of sexual harassment paired with the stereotyping of Latin Americans in the U.K. results in these behaviours and acts being perceived as the ‘norm’.
These findings provide valuable insights into the realities faced by young Latin American women and shed light on the critical issues affecting their lives.
For a more detailed understanding of our research, including a full description of the key findings and policy recommendations, please read our full report here.
Thank you for supporting the voices of young Latinas.
Our Artivism: A Creative Response to Tackle VAWG
As part of our peer research process, we also created a social media campaign to raise awareness of sexual harassment and advocate for young migrant women's rights. Our campaign reflects our commitment to tackling all forms of VAWG in British society.
Check out the entire campaign, images, and messages on our Instagram page: Sin Fronteras - LAWRS Instagram.
Get Involved
If you have any questions or want to participate in our free activities for young Latin American women, we would love to hear from you! Sign up through our Google form, or contact us via WhatsApp at 07802 645001 or by email at sinfronteras@lawrs.org.uk.
Our activities are open to Latin American girls and young women between 14 and 25 years old living in the UK, including first and second-generation women with Latin American ethnicity and European/UK nationality.
Upcoming Events
- There are no upcoming events.
- There are no upcoming events.





























